Відео

Jeden z kanałów chyba hardware unboxed testował różnice w wydajności między 2k an UWQHD i nie są one aż tak duże, teoretycznie jest koło 30% więcej pixeli ale wydajność wacha się miedzy 7-22% w zależności od gry, więc jak ci to nie przeszkadza to warto spróbować UWQHD, użycie Vram tez jest tylko marginalnie wyższe.

Its probably because of the hdr rendering youtube does because fh5 on pc maxed out is absolutely gorgeous.

If you don't mind waiting. But I do have both with an ultra wide monitor. Very happy with that. I will not get a 5080.

@@martindescoteaux9288 goated, cheers mate!

its about 20 to 30fps more on average than 4070ti super

assuming you have the same settings while playing, of course the numbers can vary depending on the settings

for me i aim for 100fps as the baseline i want on all games i play

4080 Super is 30% faster than 4070s on average, what do you mean no difference.

Jak ma to być klasyczne 1440p to możesz się spodziewać trochę wyższej wydajności niż na tym filmie, w zależności od gry 7-20%~~ także jeśłi grasz z otwartym FPS'em to zwrtóciłbym uwagę który procesor się kończy szybciej, no i jaka platforma starczy na dłużej. Dla osoby grającej tak jak ja z zalockowanym FPS do 60/70/80 w zależności od gry, procesor większego znaczenia mieć nie będzie, potrzebujesz tyle by w grach AAA z RayTracingiem procesor się nie dławił.

No i nie da się tego zmienić, chyba jedynie oszukanie Origina i zmiana języka w nim na angielski coś by pomogła tak by instalował gry w innym języku. A ten dubbing to cringe tysiąclecia, ani to śmieszne ani fajne.

its with Path Tracing and no Frame Generatior, with FG you can expect 60-80% more FPS, but since it adds alot of input lag in this game and some visual artifacts FG was OFF. Keep in mind that 3440x1440 resolution runs around 20-25% worst than standard 1440p. In Avatar Game for example, FG is adding very bad ghosting on UI so plauing with it is not worth as well.

@@Gomcio Yeah no kidding. I actually have the same res and I'm just about to build the same setup so it's a bit disappointing. Seriously thinking of downsizing to straight 1440p, or even 1080p and just supersample to 4k with DSR.

@@mick7727 I've the same monitor and lowering resolution is quite ugly on this one.

Yup, for now its perfect but 16GB of memory seems to be ideal right now, Games like The Last Of Us or RE4 can already alocate 14-16gb in this resolution, so for next 3 years something with 20GB would be better, this is why 7900XTX is best option if you dont care abour Ray Tracing that much.

@@Gomcio Even just price wise I would definitely gravitate towards the XTX at the moment too. My 10 gig 3080 has yet to run out of vram, this is the only game where I have to keep textures high instead of ultra (very high), but that's just because the game has some weird memory issues for me. I'm sure if I keep this card for the coming years I'll need to start lowering textures. And other setings too, modern games just won't run at ultra anymore on this card.

@@ZenTunE- Yup, this game responds very bad when it hits vram limit, FPS is going down by a half.

7800x3d can handle even a 4090

@@laishramdominique9900 o sweet so nothing to worry about even till next Gen GPUS i guess considering i would be buying highest even when they come out :D

I have write what settings i use at the beginning of every game. You can trust me if i say MAX it means MAX etc.

@@Gomcio but in Hogwarts Legacy u must have FG on, or something like that cuz i have also r7 7800x3d, 4080 super 64gb cl 30 an without FG 60-80 FPS u hav 120, that not possible. with FG i hav 90 FPS on the exact same position

@@zenoderallerechte FG was OFF, i have screenshoots of my setting but they are in polish language. Hagward Legacy runs very wild, in some places i have 140fps and CPU bound and there is some locations where you are CPU bound to 60 even with 7800x3d. To confirm that you must go to same locations. I choice location outside of castle since in the castle fps is very high, and in some areas after you are getting CPU bottleneck with Ray Tracing so checking fps with 70% GPU usage is not the best option.

@@Gomcio yes i know HL is wild but i have the exact same settings like u and im on the exact same place like u and hav an half of the fps u showing, something is wrong here

@@zenoderallerechte Maybe you played in native resolution, i had DLSS quality. Also check if your RAM has XMP or EXPO enabled in BIOS, maybe you are slowing down your CPU by having ram at 4200Mhz or something.

Bro can i ask you. HDR good for games in 4080 or not? I cant understand need to turn on it or no. I have 40* IPS ultrawide monitor.

@@WinckeD HDR has no performance impact so you can use it on any GPU. Its amazing especially if you get yourself OLED TV/Monitor. Colors, contrast, how deep black is... its absolutly amazing and worth having especially right now when so many OLED monitors entered the market. Some IPS panels also have HDR but maybe some 300+ or 400+ versions, its not looking as good but its better than nothing, so if you can, then keep HDR ON. But if you can get yourself Monitor with 1000+ HDR it would be best option to enjoy that innovation. After playing on my PS5 with LG OLED C1 i cant go back to SDR, thats why i choice this Alienware moniotor from all UltraWide options since its not the most expensive but extreamly good and HAS HDR 1000 after update. Remember to download Windows HDR configuration APP and set it correctly, its importand.

@@Gomcio ty bro for the answer

in 1080p its fine, but in higher resolution 6GB will be welcome. I have played this game without issues on my 6GB RTX2060 in 3440x1440p res with ultra textures and i didnt noticed any additional stutters or signs of low Vram.

Higher Tessellation quality improves from how many triangles some visuals are build, like in thats example with snow, holes look smoother.

You could also set a custom resolution to test the 21:9 aspect ratio and performance on your TV. Many people also game this way instead of buying a new monitor, especially with OLED TV's the black bars are not very noticable and picture quality is incredible

Yup, if you have Oled TV you can try to use 21:9 aspect ratio with black bars as nikhamblin said o you can try 3840×1600, its 12:5 instead of 21:9 but it fits perfectly in 4k TV.

To na mesma irmao, tnho uma gtx 1070 aliewnwiere e queria comorar o monitor husck 3440x1440 ultrawide mas to na divida o quanto de fos vai roda

Sorry for late answer but im not checking my comments any more but if you ever read this: - with using riva tuner and msi afterburner you can check if your GPU utilization is 100% if not its CPU. - If its CPU then make sure you have XMP Profile "ON" in your bios and your ram is in Dual Channel mode (2x4GB in correct slot)

Currently deciding between a 32 inch 1440p and 34 inch ultrawide 1440 p how big is the drop I want it for racing games which is why I want the ultrawide but I can't stand low fps how big is the hit?

@@RonRon0110 Around 20%. If you are primarily playing racing games you should be fine as most of them are not that intensive to run. I say go for the ultrawide man, it's amazing for gaming.

@@Krenisphia yeah I really want to only game I'm really worried about is assetto corsa with all the photorealistic mods especially in a heavy traffic online server I have a 7800x3d and a 4070 super but I know how much load the graphics and heavy traffic add

Yeah, i think i missed that one